Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University, USA
Abstract
Uberveillance of humans will emerge through embedding chips within nonhumans in order to monitor humans. The case explored in this chapter involves the development of nanotechnology and biosensors for the real-time tracking of the identity, location, and properties of livestock in the U.S. agrifood system. The primary method for research on this case was an expert forum. Developers of biosensors see the tracking capabilities as empowering users to control some aspects of a situation that they face. Such control promises to improve public health, animal welfare, and/or economic gains. However, the ways in which social and ethical frameworks are built into standards for the privacy/access, organization, adaptability, and transferability of data are crucial in determining whether the diverse actors in the supply chain will embrace nanobiosensors and advance the ideals of the developers. Further research should be done that explores the possibilities of tripartite standards regimes and sousveillance in relation to nanobiosensors in agrifood.
Reference65 articles.
1. The coming age of RFID revolution.;M.Attaran;Journal of International Technology and Information Management,2006
2. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnologies: Foresight, engagement and integration;D.Barben;The new handbook of science and technology studies,2008
3. Bickel, A. (2010, February 12). Ag department drops livestock tracing program. Tribune Business News.
4. The Ethics of Agri-Food Biotechnology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献