The Ethos of Online Publishing

Author:

Erickson Joe1,Blair Kristine2

Affiliation:

1. Angelo State University, USA

2. Bowling Green State University, USA

Abstract

This chapter argues that online academic journals are not only a legitimate venue and sustainable source of disciplinary inquiry, but an important professional development opportunity for graduate students as future faculty and are therefore crucial to maintaining a discipline's ethos. The authors begin by reviewing the ethos of individually produced print publications in the humanities, paying particular attention to the value such publications hold in helping scholars earn tenure and promotion. The authors then posit that efforts within the rhetoric and writing scholarly community to recognize the collaborative nature of multimodal digital texts and to advocate for the collaborative production of such digital texts, which has helped such scholarship achieve a higher level of ethos over the past two decades. Emphasizing the role of graduate students in these ongoing efforts, the authors conclude by recommending three benchmarks developing and advanced scholars should implement to increase their own professional development and thus the ethos of online academic publishing: curricular development, team development, and dissertation research.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference36 articles.

1. Apostel, S., & Folk, M. (2005). First phase information literacy on a fourth generation website: An argument for a new approach to website evaluation criteria. Computers and Composition Online, Spring. Retrieved February 5, 2012, from http://www.bgsu.edu/cconline/apostelfolk/c_and_c_online_apostel_folk/apostel_folk.htm

2. Apple. (2012). Apple in education. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://www.apple.com/education/ibooks-textbooks/

3. Show, not tell: The value of new media scholarship.;C.Ball;Computers and Composition,2004

4. Ball, C. (2012). Logging on: Review of Profession 2011 section on “Evaluating Digital Scholarship.” Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 16(2). Retrieved February 4, 2012 from http://www.technorhetoric.net/16.2/loggingon/lo-profession.html

5. Assessing Scholarly Multimedia: A Rhetorical Genre Studies Approach

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3