Affiliation:
1. University of Cambridge, UK
Abstract
Constructivism has been widely adopted as a referent for research, curriculum development and recommended pedagogy in education. This chapter considers key issues relating to the adoption of constructivist thinking in education which have arisen within the field of science education. Constructivism has been mooted as a dominant paradigm in science education, where it has informed a major research programme over some decades. However, the application of constructivist ideas in science education has also been subject to a range of critiques. This chapter gives an outline of the developing influence of constructivism in science education, and the common understandings of the term in relation to science teaching and learning; it reports on the main areas where the influence of constructivist thinking has been heavily criticised, and discusses how these criticisms are countered within the research programme; it considers some major directions for research within the research programme; and it evaluates the level of influence of constructivism in contemporary science education practice.
Reference146 articles.
1. The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science
2. The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science
3. Adey, P. (1999). The Science of Thinking, and Science For Thinking: a description of Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE). Geneva: International Bureau of Education (UNESCO).
4. Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the nature of Science: Perspectives and Resources. Saint Paul, MN: SHiPS Educational Press.
5. Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage?
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献