Affiliation:
1. The Ohio State University, USA
Abstract
The working relationships between Native American tribes, the states, and the federal government have been strained for centuries. These intergovernmental interactions have led to a fragmented system whose attempt to deliver public service is consistently met with opposition. One area where this has become increasingly evident is within homeland security and emergency management policy. This study used a cross sectional survey to gather information about the beliefs tribes held about the various aspects of their working relationships with states and the federal government within the context of homeland security and emergency management. Analysis of the data revealed that the majority of the intergovernmental relationships that existed between tribes and the U.S. government did not possess the characteristics of an effective working relationship. Evidence also suggests that the intergovernmental relationships were actually having a negative impact on the U.S. government's goal to achieve a unified system of homeland security and emergency management on American soil.
Reference41 articles.
1. Sovereignty, safety, and security: Tribal governments under the Stafford and homeland security acts.;H.Adams;American Indian Law Journal,2012
2. American Indian Policy Center. (2002). Brief history of U.S. tribal relations. Retrieved 2011 from http://www.airpi.org
3. Ashley, J. S., & Jarratt-Ziemski, K. (1999). Superficiality and bias: the (mis)treatment of Native Americans in U. S. government textbooks. American Indian Quarterly, 23(3/4), 49-62.
4. Missing