Affiliation:
1. Independent Centre for Analysis and Research of Economies (ICARE), Australia
Abstract
Economic, social and environmental policies, programs and projects have impact on health. Health in All Policies (HiAP) aims to improve population health by taking into account these impacts. HiAP needs appropriate tools for assessing impacts on population health. When making choices between policy options, decision-makers rely on predictions from Health Impact Assessment. Currently there is no gold standard for establishing and assessing validity of predictions. This paper distinguishes between two levels of causal pathways regarding health impacts – specific and conditional, and proposes the Average Health Status – Health Inequalities Matrix as gold standard. The Matrix facilitates making the right choices at any level and local context, thus is useful for researchers, policy-makers and practitioners for designing, analysing and evaluating all kinds of policies. By allowing quick, reliable and inexpensive appraisal of different policy options the matrix makes feasible taking into account the impacts on population health and paves the way for institutionalizing of HiAP.
Reference30 articles.
1. Bamberger, M., & Segone, M. (2011). How to design and manage Equity-focused evaluations (p. 9). UNICEF Evaluation office, New York.
2. From concept to practice: Including the social determinants of health in environmental assessments;R.Banken;Canadian Journal of Public Health,1999
3. Social impact assessment: method and experience in Europe, North America and the Developing World;H.Becker;Social Research Today,1997
4. Connelly, J. (2001). Critical realism and health promotion: effective practice needs an effective theory [Editorial]. Health Edu Research, 16(2), 115-120. Oxford University Press