Occupational Therapists’ Perceptions about the Non-Use of Recommended Assistive Technology (AT)

Author:

Wielandt Patricia1

Affiliation:

1. University of Alberta, Canada

Abstract

First this chapter will present an overview about assistive technology (AT). Next factors identified in the literature and thought to influence AT use will be presented. The second part of the chapter will present the findings extracted from a larger three-phase study, which aimed to obtain occupational therapists’ perceptions about AT non-use. Drawing from their experiences therapists identified the client-, AT-, intervention-focused factors which they had found to influence use. Some of these factors were similar to those identified in the literature, with therapists offering additional perspectives about the role these issues actually played in affecting AT use. In addition, therapists highlighted other important factors, not previously identified as influential or which had received little attention. Overall results showed support for a client-centred approach during the provision of AT. Suggestions were made to incorporate the Matching Person with Technology (MPT) model into current practice to guide the AT provision process.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference74 articles.

1. Verbal strategies used by occupational therapist in direct client encounters.;H.Allison;The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research,1994

2. Identifying best practice in the occupational therapy assistive technology evaluation: an analysis of three focus groups.;J.Angelo;The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.,1997

3. Evaluation;B. K.Bain;Assistive technology: an interdisciplinary approach,1997

4. The impact of culture on patient education.;A. B.Blakeney;Occupational Therapy Practice,1991

5. Rehabilitation engineering service evaluation: a follow-up survey of device effectiveness and patient acceptance.;D. J.Caudrey;Rehabilitation Literature,1983

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3