Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina, Charlotte, USA
2. Bialystok Technical University, Poland
Abstract
One way to make Query Answering System (QAS) intelligent is to assume a hierarchical structure of its attributes. Such systems have been investigated by (Cuppens & Demolombe, 1988), (Gal & Minker, 1988), (Gaasterland et al., 1992) and they are called cooperative. Any attribute value listed in a query, submitted to cooperative QAS, is seen as a node of the tree representing that attribute. If QAS retrieves no objects supporting query q, from a queried information system S, then any attribute value listed in q can be generalized and the same the number of objects supporting q in S can increase. In cooperative systems, these generalizations are controlled either by users (Gal & Minker, 1988), or by knowledge discovery techniques (Muslea, 2004). If QAS for S collaborates and exchanges knowledge with other systems, then it is also called intelligent. In papers (Ras & Dardzinska, 2004, 2006), a guided process of rules extraction and their goal-oriented exchange among systems is proposed. These rules define foreign attribute values for S and they are used to construct new attributes and/or impute null or hidden values of attributes in S. By enlarging the set of attributes from which queries for S can be built and by reducing the incompleteness of S, we not only enlarge the set of queries which QAS can successfully handle but also we increase the overall number of retrieved objects. So, QAS based on knowledge discovery has two classical scenarios which need to be considered: • System is standalone and incomplete. Classification rules are extracted and used to predict what values should replace null values before any query is answered. • System is distributed with autonomous sites (including site S). User needs to retrieve objects from S satisfying query q containing nonlocal attributes for S. We search for definitions of these non-local attributes at remote sites for S and use them to approximate q (Ras & Zytkow, 2000), (Ras & Dardzinska, 2004, 2006). The goal of this article is to provide foundations and basic results for knowledge-discovery based QAS.
Reference16 articles.
1. Atzeni, P., & DeAntonellis, V. (1992). Relational Database Theory, The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company.
2. Cuppens, F., & Demolombe, R. (1988). Cooperative answering: a methodology to provide intelligent access to databases, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Expert Database Systems, 333-353.
3. Dardzinska, A., & Ras, Z. (2005). CHASE-2: Rule based chase algorithm for information systems of type lambda, Post-proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Active Mining (AM’2003), Maebashi City, Japan, LNAI 3430, Springer, 258-270
4. Dardzinska, A., & Ras, Z. (2006). Extracting rules from incomplete decision systems: System ERID, in Foundations and Novel Approaches in Data Mining, Studies in Computational Intelligence 9, Springer, 143-154
5. Relaxation as a platform for cooperative answering
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. How to Efficiently Diagnose and Repair Fuzzy Database Queries that Fail;Fifty Years of Fuzzy Logic and its Applications;2015
2. Fuzzy Cardinalities as a Basis to Cooperative Answering;Flexible Approaches in Data, Information and Knowledge Management;2013-09-12