Affiliation:
1. Karlstad University, Sweden
Abstract
A critical success factor for Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs), and for Privacy-Enhancing Identity Management in particular, will be user-friendly and intelligible user interfaces that are legally compliant and convey trust. Such user interfaces have to meet challenges such as the user-friendly representation of complex PET concepts (such as “pseudonyms”, “unlinkabilty” or “anonymous credentials”) that are unfamiliar to many users, the provision of security, the enforcement of legal privacy principles, such as informed consent or transparency, as well as the mediation of reliable trust to the end users. In this paper, we will discuss such challenges for usable privacy-enhancing identity management and will provide some HCI guidelines for addressing those challenges.
Reference33 articles.
1. Andersson, C., Camenisch, J., & Crane, S. Fischer-Hübner, S., Leenes, R., Pearson,S., Pettersson, J.S., & Sommer, D. (2005). Trust in PRIME. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Int. Symposium on Signal Processing and IT, December 18-21, 2005, Athens, Greece.
2. Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. (2004). Opinion on More Harmonised Information provisions. 11987/04/EN WP 100, November 25 2004.
3. Bergmann, M., Rost, M., & Pettersson, J. S. (2006). Exploring the Feasibility of a Spatial User Interface Paradigm for Privacy-Enhancing Technology. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD’2005) (pp. 437-448), Karlstad, August 2005. Published in Advances in Information Systems Development, Springer-Verlag, Germany.
4. Camenisch, J., & Lysyanskaya, A. (2001). Efficient non-transferable anonymous multi-show credential system with optional anonymity revocation. In Advances in Cryptology - Eurocrypt 2001 (pp. 92-118), 2045.