Affiliation:
1. Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Abstract
The requirement of always obtaining participants’ informed consent in research with human subjects cannot always be met, for a variety of reasons. This paper describes and categorises research situations where informed consent is unobtainable. Some of these kinds of situations, common in biomedicine and psychology, have been previously discussed, whereas others, for example, those more prevalent in infrastructure research, introduce new perspectives. The advancement of new technology may lead to an increase in research of these kinds. The paper also provides a review of methods intended to compensate for lack of consent, and their applicability and usefulness for the different categories of situations are discussed. The aim of this is to provide insights into one important aspect of the question of permitting research without informed consent, namely, how well that which informed consent is meant to safeguard can be achieved by other means.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference34 articles.
1. “What the patient would have decided”: A fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard
2. Informed consent in social experimentation: Some cautionary notes;P. G.Brown;Ethical and legal issues of social experimentation,1975
3. Capron, A. (1982). The authority of others to decide about biomedical interventions with incompetents. In W. Gaylin & R. Macklin (Eds.), Who speaks for the child? (pp. 115-152). Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: The Hastings Center.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献