A Comparative Evaluation of Different Keyword Extraction Techniques

Author:

Bisht Raj Kishor1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics and Computing, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India

Abstract

Retrieving keywords in a text is attracting researchers for a long time as it forms a base for many natural language applications like information retrieval, text summarization, document categorization etc. A text is a collection of words that represent the theme of the text naturally and to bring the naturalism under certain rules is itself a challenging task. In the present paper, the authors evaluate different spatial distribution based keyword extraction methods available in the literature on three standard scientific texts. The authors choose the first few high-frequency words for evaluation to reduce the complexity as all the methods are somehow based on frequency. The authors find that the methods are not providing good results particularly in the case of the first few retrieved words. Thus, the authors propose a new measure based on frequency, inverse document frequency, variance, and Tsallis entropy. Evaluation of different methods is done on the basis of precision, recall, and F-measure. Results show that the proposed method provides improved results.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

General Medicine

Reference1 articles.

1. In spite of a number of researchers worked in the direction of keyword extraction but still, no method is perfect. For different texts, the result of a particular method may vary. A number of different factors may work for a particular kind of text. Firoozeh et al. (2020) discussed such issues in keyword extraction. Thus, it is interesting to know the results of different methods for some particular kinds of texts. This motivated the author to conduct research work in this direction. Here the objective is to provide a comparative evaluation of different spatial distribution based keyword extraction methods, particularly for scientific text. Some standard texts are available on the Web with the list of keywords. Thus, different methods can be evaluated for their performances with respect to the scientific texts. First, the author provides a brief discussion of each of these methods. The various existing methods are as follows:

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3