Affiliation:
1. Robert Morris University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a four-year study examining business students’ perceptions of academic integrity and the role of technology in e-learning. This study is an extension of previous research on academic integrity in the online environment (Cole, Shelley & Swartz, 2013; Cole & Swartz, 2013; Shelley, Cole & Swartz, 2010). Of the 553 students who participated in the study, more than a third did not believe that academic integrity applied equally online and in the classroom. Independent-samples t-tests showed statistically significant differences based on gender, but not by age group or level of study. There were 200 responses to what made the two learning environments different. Students pointed to the “real world” where accessing all available resources to solve a problem was the norm, suggesting that instructors should recognize that and adapt their expectations of what is and is not acceptable behavior in the courses they teach.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference44 articles.
1. Albers, K. (2007). Poll: Tougher catching cheating with online test takers, educators say. Naplesnews.com. Retrieved May 12, 2010 from http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2007/jul/15/tougher_catch_co...
2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research group, LLC. Retrieved April 9, 2013, from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf
3. Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts
4. Baggett, S. B., & Williams, M. (2012, January-March). Student behaviors and opinions regarding the use of social media, mobile technologies, and library research. Virginia Libraries, 19-22.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献