Distinguishing Standards and Regulation for Innovation Research

Author:

Egyedi Tineke M.1,Widlak Arjan2,Ortt J. Roland3

Affiliation:

1. DIRoS, Amsterdam, Netherlands

2. Kafka Brigade Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands

3. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Abstract

Certain influential innovation impact studies do not sharply distinguish standards from regulation. Is differentiation needed? In what way do they differ in how they work and work out? This article applies and extends a framework of regulatory modalities to open up the black box of direct innovation effects. It includes standards as a separate regulatory modality following careful consideration of alternatives, i.e., accommodating them as a special instance or as a hybrid of law, norm, market and architecture. The authors capture the essential differences between standards and law. They reconcile Lessig's emphasis on constraints with findings of enabling and constraining effects in innovation research by differentiating direct inherently constraining effects of regulatory modalities and modality-specific direct generic effects - as opposed to indirect effects. They conclude that standards and law merit separate treatment in innovation research, and recommend complementary frameworks to uncover unaddressed issues.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Computer Science Applications

Reference53 articles.

1. Customs, Norms, Rules, Regulations and Standards in Design Practice;W.Baer;Companion to Urban Design,2011

2. Bekkers, V., Dijkstra, G., Edwards, A., & Fenger, M. (Eds.). (2007). Governance and the democratic deficit: Assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practices. London: Ashgate.

3. Legitimacy and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Governance Practices;V.Bekkers;Governance and the democratic deficit: Assessing the democratic legitimacy of governance practices,2007

4. Blind, K. (2012). The Impact of Regulation on Innovation. Nesta. Retrieved from www.nesta.org.uk/wp12‐02

5. The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Stakeholder perceptions of the role of standards for addressing the sustainable development goals;Sustainable Production and Consumption;2023-05

2. How Standards Co-Shape Personal Data Protection in the European Banking Sector;2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW);2021-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3