Management of Correctness Problems in UML Class Diagrams Towards a Pattern-Based Approach

Author:

Balaban Mira1,Maraee Azzam1,Sturm Arnon1

Affiliation:

1. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Abstract

UML is now widely accepted as the standard modeling language for software construction. The Class Diagram is its core view, having well formed semantics and providing the backbone for any modeling effort. Class diagrams are widely used for purposes such as software specification, database and ontology engineering, meta-modeling, and model transformation. The central role played by class diagrams emphasizes the need for strengthening UML modeling tools with features such as recognition of erroneous models and the detection of errors’ sources. Correctness of UML class diagrams refers to the capability of a diagram to denote a finite but not empty reality. This is a natural, unquestionable requirement. Nevertheless, incorrect diagrams are often designed, due to the interaction of contradicting constraints and the limitations of current tools. In this paper, the authors clarify the notion of class diagram correctness, discuss various approaches for detecting correctness problems, and propose a pattern-based approach for identifying situations in which correctness problems occur, and for providing explanations and repair advices.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems

Reference55 articles.

1. Ackermann, J., & Turowski, K. (2006). A Library of OCL Specification Patterns to Simplify Behavioral Specification of Software Components. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2006), Luxembourg, Germany (pp. 255-269). Berlin: Springer.

2. Anastasakis, K., Bordbar, B., Georg, G., & Ray, I. (2007). UML2Alloy: A Challenging Model Transformation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2007), Nashville, TN (pp. 436-450). Berlin: Springer.

3. Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Kontchakov, R., Ryzhikov, V., & Zakharyaschev, M. (2007). Complexity of Reasoning over Entity-Relationship Models. In Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Description Logic (DL 2007), Brixen-Bressanone, Italy (pp. 163-170).

4. Balaban, M., & Maraee, A. (2006). Consistency of UML Class Diagrams with Hierarchy Constraints. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems (NGITS 2006), Kibbuts Shefayim, Israel (pp. 71-82). Berlin: Springer.

5. MEER—An EER model enhanced with structure methods

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3