Developing Semantically-Enabled Families of Method-Oriented Architectures
Author:
Asadi Mohsen1, Mohabbati Bardia1, Gaševic Dragan2, Bagheri Ebrahim2, Hatala Marek1
Affiliation:
1. School of Interactive Art & Technology (SIAT), Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada 2. School of Computing and Information Systems, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, Canada
Abstract
Method Engineering (ME) aims to improve software development methods by creating and proposing adaptation frameworks whereby methods are created to provide suitable matches with the requirements of the organization and address project concerns and fit specific situations. Therefore, methods are defined and modularized into components stored in method repositories. The assembly of appropriate methods depends on the particularities of each project, and rapid method construction is inevitable in the reuse and management of existing methods. The ME discipline aims at providing engineering capability for optimizing, reusing, and ensuring flexibility and adaptability of methods; there are three key research challenges which can be observed in the literature: 1) the lack of standards and tooling support for defining, publishing, discovering, and retrieving methods which are only locally used by their providers without been largely adapted by other organizations; 2) dynamic adaptation and assembly of methods with respect to imposed continuous changes or evolutions of the project lifecycle; and 3) variability management in software methods in order to enable rapid and effective construction, assembly and adaptation of existing methods with respect to particular situations. The authors propose semantically-enabled families of method-oriented architecture by applying service-oriented product line engineering principles and employing Semantic Web technologies.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems
Reference35 articles.
1. Aharoni, A., & Reinhartz-Berger, I. (2008). A domain engineering approach for situational method engineering. In Q. Li, S. Spaccapietra, E. Yu, & A. Olivé (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (LNCS 5231, 455-468). 2. Akhtar, W., Kopecký, J., Krennwallner, T., & Polleres, A. (n.d.). XSPARQL: Traveling between the XML and RDF Worlds – and avoiding the XSLT pilgrimage. In S. Bechhofer, M. Hauswirth, J. Hoffmann, & M. Koubarakis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Semantic Web: Research and Applications (LNCS 5021, pp. 432-447). 3. Patterns of Situational Method Engineering 4. Bagheri, E., Asadi, M., Ensan, F., Gašević, D., & Mohabbati, B. (2011). Bringing semantics to feature models with SAFMDL. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (pp. 287-300). 5. Bagheri, E., Asadi, M., Gasevic, D., & Soltani, S. (2010). Stratified analytic hierarchy process: prioritization and selection of software features. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Product Lines: Going Beyond (pp. 300-315).
|
|