Comparing Effectiveness of E-learning Training and Traditional Training in Industrial Safety and Health

Author:

Rozar Norlinda Binti Mohd1,Ibrahim Abdullah Bin2,Razik Muhammad Ashlyzan Bin3

Affiliation:

1. University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia

2. Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia

3. Open University, KFORCE, and Politeknik sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia

Abstract

In response to the demanding change in work environments, most companies not only depend on traditional training, but also on e-learning and emphasizing it in safety and health. The benefits and cost effectiveness of the benefits of e-learning training are trusted. Nevertheless, accidents still happen at the workplace. This has become an issue to be studied, especially on the effectiveness of e-learning training in comparison to traditional training. In this study, a framework to measure comparative effectiveness between these two learning environments was developed based on Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation model and a case study was applied to test all the levels of the framework. These four levels include participant reaction, learning, achievements, behavior of employees, and results. The interview results indicated that there is no difference in the rating of the effectiveness of the two training methods based on Kirkpatrick’s model.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference25 articles.

1. Lessons in e-learning.;S.Alexander;Computerworld,2001

2. Employee perceived training effectiveness relationship to employee attitudes

3. Berk, J. A. (2003). The buzz surrounding learning analytics. Retrieved from http://www.knowledgeadvisors.com/archives/the-buzz-surrounding-learning-analytics/

4. The success case: A low-cost, high-yield evaluation.;R. O.Brinkerhoff;Training & Development,1983

5. Input, process, output: A model for evaluating training.;D. S.Bushnell;Training and Development Journal,1990

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3