AGRICULTURAL BUDGET IN THE FUNCTION OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

AGRICULTURAL BUDGET IN THE FUNCTION OF ORGANIC AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT IN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO

Published:2023-06-19 Issue:2 Volume:70 Page:645-659
ISSN:2334-8453
Container-title:Ekonomika poljoprivrede
language:
Short-container-title:EA

Author:

Radović Gordana^ORCID,Zejak Dejan^ORCID,Pejanović Vladimir^ORCID

Abstract

Organic agricultural production requires higher financial investments than conventional agricultural production. Seed prices are higher, labor costs are higher, and there is the additional cost of certification. That is why the existence of incentive measures of agricultural policy is necessary for organic agriculture. The aim of the paper is to present the incentives paid from the agricultural budget for organic agriculture in Serbia and Montenegro. The authors conclude that subsidies for organic agriculture, although they are paid continuously and are a significant incentive, have a small percentage share in the agricultural budget in both countries. In Serbia, 1% and 3% of registered farms in Montenegro practice organic agriculture.

Publisher

Balkan Scientific Association of Agricultural Economists

Subject

Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology

Reference46 articles.

1. Bataković, R., Matavulj, M. (2022). Izvještaj o statusu organske poljoprivrede i industrije u Crnoj Gori. Urednici: Lenz, J., Neumann, C., EkoConnecte.V. Schützengasse16 01067 Dresden, pp. 1-21. [in English: Bataković, R., Matavulj, M. (2022). Report on the status of organic agriculture and industry in Montenegro. Editors: Lenz, J., Neumann, C., EkoConnecte.V. Schützengasse 16 01067 Dresden, pp. 1-21.]. Retrieved from http://www.ekoconnect.org/tl_files/eko/p/Projekte/MOE-Laenderberichte/Izvjestaj-o-organskoj-poljoprivredi-CRNA-GORAEkoConnect-2022.pdf

2. Clark, S. (2020). Organic Farming and Climate Change: The Need for Innovation. Sustainability, 2020,12, 7012. DOI:10.3390/su12177012

3. Cvijanović, D, Subić, J, Paraušić, V. (2014). Poljoprivredna gazdinstva prema ekonomskoj veličini i tipu proizvodnje u Republici Srbiji, Popis poljoprivrede 2012, Poljoprivreda u Republici Srbiji. Republički zavod za statistiku, Beograd. [in English: Cvijanović, D., Subić, J., Paraušić, V. (2014). Agricultural farms according to economic size and type of production in the Republic of Serbia, Census of Agriculture 2012, Agriculture in the Republic of Serbia. Republic Institute of Statistics, Belgrade.]. Retrieved from https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2014/Pdf/G201414007.pdf

4. Ignatenko, I. (2020). Legal Aspects of Development of Organic Agriculture in Ukraine in the Context of European Integration. Economics of Agriculture, Year 67, No. 3, pp. 973-990.

5. Katić, B, Cvijanović, D, Cicea, C. (2008). Organska proizvodnja u funkciji zaštite životne sredine u Srbiji – stanje i regulativa. Ekonomika poljoprivrede, Vol. 55, Br. 3, pp.267-276. [in English: Katic, B., Cvijanović, D., Cicea, C. (2008). Organic production in the function of environmental protection in Serbia - situation and regulations. Economics of Agriculture, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 267-276.].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. COMPARING THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF OPEN FIELD AND PROTECTED AREA ORGANIC TOMATO CULTIVATION SYSTEMS;Ekonomika poljoprivrede;2024-06-19