MITIGATING SPATIAL DISPROPORTIONS IN AGRICULTURE THROUGH REVEALING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES
Author:
Erokhin VasiliiORCID, Samygin DenisORCID, Tuskov AndreyORCID, Ivolga AnnaORCID
Abstract
Spatial development of agriculture has always been among the core agendas of food security. Amid the increased volatility of food markets globally, low diversification of agricultural production depresses competitiveness and flexibility of farmers. To narrow spatial development gaps, the study presents the five-stage approach to revealing territory-specific competitive advantages in producing nine categories of agricultural products. The data is collected across all administrative territories of Russia categorized according to the cadastral value of farmland. The revealed mismatches between the parameters of food self-sufficiency, productivity of crops, and profitability of farmers show that agricultural policy should aim at stimulating production of competitive products with due account to the spatial features of agriculture to ensure the highest return per unit of inputs along with adequate accessibility of staples for consumers. Determining proportions in which agricultural facilities should be allocated across territories would allow governments to tailor the resource provision programs, including subsidies to territories, agricultural sectors, and individual producers.
Publisher
Balkan Scientific Association of Agricultural Economists
Subject
Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference46 articles.
1. Addai, G., Abunyewah, M., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M.O., Okyere, S.A., Gyensare, M.A., & Guodaar, L. (2023). Application of the Rural Web Framework within the Context of Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15, 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054239. 2. Akram, M.W., Akram, N., Wang, H., Andleeb, S., Ur Rehman, K., Kashif, U., & Hassan, S.F. (2020). Socioeconomics Determinants to Adopt Agricultural Machinery for Sustainable Organic Farming in Pakistan: A Multinomial Probit Model. Sustainability, 12, 9806. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239806. 3. Al-Abdelmalek, N., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N.C., Fares, E., Ayad H., Bulak, M.E., Ekren, B.Y., Kazancoglu, Y., & Ertogral, K. (2023). Transforming Challenges into Opportunities for Qatar’s Food Industry: Self-Sufficiency, Sustainability, and Global Food Trade Diversification. Sustainability, 15, 5755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075755. 4. Aliyeva, L., Huseynova, S., Babayeva, S., Huseynova, V., Nasirova, O., & Hasanzade, F. (2019). Food Security and Optimal Government Intervention Level in Agriculture (Comparative Analysis). Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25, 12-20. 5. Asadullah, M.N., & Savoia, A. (2018). Poverty Reduction during 1990–2013: Did Millennium Development Goals Adoption and State Capacity Matter? World Development, 105, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.010.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Causality Between the Green Development and the Food Security Agendas in China;Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services;2024-06-28
|
|