Current state and prospects of the development of judicial control of administrative courts by public administration bodies

Author:

IVANOVA Roksolana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law

Abstract

Introduction. In an era marked by rapid changes in governance and legal paradigms, the role of judicial control exerted by administrative courts on public administration bodies has emerged as a cornerstone of modern legal systems. This study aims to delve into the current state of this judicial control, exploring its evolution, challenges, and impact on the functioning of public administration. It also aims to forecast the future development of this interplay, considering the changing legal, social, and political landscapes. The primary purpose of the paper is to comprehensively assess and understand the current state and future prospects of judicial control exercised by administrative courts over public administration bodies. This involves a multifaceted exploration of the role, challenges, and evolving dynamics in this area of governance. Results. The in-depth analysis of the current state and the potential future developments in the judicial control exerted by administrative courts by public administration bodies has led to several key findings: The current state reveals a heightened emphasis on the role of administrative courts in ensuring that public administration bodies adhere to legal and ethical standards. This increased scrutiny is a response to a growing demand for transparency and accountability in public administration. The study indicates significant variation in the approaches and intensity of judicial control among different countries. Some regions show a trend towards more rigorous judicial oversight, while others maintain a more traditional, restrained approach. Conclusion. In summary, the growing influence of judicial control by administrative courts is a response to the evolving needs of modern governance. It reflects a societal shift towards greater accountability and legal compliance in public administration. The future will likely see continued efforts to refine this relationship, ensuring that it fosters a system of governance that is both effective and just, and which upholds the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

Publisher

JSC Analityk

Reference7 articles.

1. 1. Mcharg A. Administrative Discretion, Administrative Rule-Making and Judicial Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. p. 270.

2. 2. Maurer H. Algemeines Verwaltungsrecht. München. 2011. 148 p.

3. 3. Resolution (77) 31 on the protection of the individual in relation to the acts of administrative authorities. Council of Europe. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804dec56

4. 4. Recommendation No R (80) 2 concerning the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804f22ae

5. 5. Recommendation No R (87) 16 on administrative procedures affecting a large number of persons. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804eaa5c

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3