Affiliation:
1. Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law
Abstract
Introduction. In an era marked by rapid changes in governance and legal paradigms, the role of judicial control exerted by administrative courts on public administration bodies has emerged as a cornerstone of modern legal systems. This study aims to delve into the current state of this judicial control, exploring its evolution, challenges, and impact on the functioning of public administration. It also aims to forecast the future development of this interplay, considering the changing legal, social, and political landscapes.
The primary purpose of the paper is to comprehensively assess and understand the current state and future prospects of judicial control exercised by administrative courts over public administration bodies. This involves a multifaceted exploration of the role, challenges, and evolving dynamics in this area of governance.
Results. The in-depth analysis of the current state and the potential future developments in the judicial control exerted by administrative courts by public administration bodies has led to several key findings: The current state reveals a heightened emphasis on the role of administrative courts in ensuring that public administration bodies adhere to legal and ethical standards. This increased scrutiny is a response to a growing demand for transparency and accountability in public administration. The study indicates significant variation in the approaches and intensity of judicial control among different countries. Some regions show a trend towards more rigorous judicial oversight, while others maintain a more traditional, restrained approach.
Conclusion. In summary, the growing influence of judicial control by administrative courts is a response to the evolving needs of modern governance. It reflects a societal shift towards greater accountability and legal compliance in public administration. The future will likely see continued efforts to refine this relationship, ensuring that it fosters a system of governance that is both effective and just, and which upholds the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
Reference7 articles.
1. 1. Mcharg A. Administrative Discretion, Administrative Rule-Making and Judicial Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. p. 270.
2. 2. Maurer H. Algemeines Verwaltungsrecht. München. 2011. 148 p.
3. 3. Resolution (77) 31 on the protection of the individual in relation to the acts of administrative authorities. Council of Europe. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804dec56
4. 4. Recommendation No R (80) 2 concerning the exercise of discretionary powers by administrative authorities. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804f22ae
5. 5. Recommendation No R (87) 16 on administrative procedures affecting a large number of persons. URL: https://rm.coe.int/16804eaa5c