Affiliation:
1. Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego
2. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the degree of dominance of Mandarin–English bilinguals' languages affects phonetic processing of tone content in their native language, Mandarin.
Method
We tested 72 Mandarin–English bilingual college students with a range of language-dominance profiles in the 2 languages and ages of acquisition of English. Participants viewed 2 photographs at a time while hearing a familiar Mandarin word referring to 1 photograph. The names of the 2 photographs diverged in tone, vowels, or both. Word recognition was evaluated using clicking accuracy, reaction times, and an online recognition measure (gaze) and was compared in the 3 conditions.
Results
Relative proficiency in English was correlated with reduced word recognition success in tone
-
disambiguated trials, but not in vowel-disambiguated trials, across all 3 dependent measures. This selective attrition for tone content emerged even though all bilinguals had learned Mandarin from birth. Lengthy experience with English thus weakened tone use.
Conclusions
This finding has implications for the question of the extent to which bilinguals' 2 phonetic systems interact. It suggests that bilinguals may not process pitch information language-specifically and that processing strategies from the dominant language may affect phonetic processing in the nondominant language—even when the latter was learned natively.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Exploring Musical Aptitude, Parental Involvement and Challenges: Basis for Enhancing the Music Program;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-08-20
2. The influence of L2 experience on L1 speech perception: Evidence from Mandarin–English bilinguals;International Journal of Bilingualism;2022-06-22
3. Erratum;Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research;2018-05-17