Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Iowa, Iowa City
2. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
Abstract
Purpose:
Aphasia fluency is multiply determined by underlying impairments in lexical retrieval, grammatical formulation, and speech production. This poses challenges for establishing a reliable and feasible tool to measure fluency in the clinic. We examine the reliability and validity of perceptual ratings and clinical perspectives on the utility and relevance of methods used to assess fluency.
Method:
In an online survey, 112 speech-language pathologists rated spontaneous speech samples from 181 people with aphasia (PwA) on eight perceptual rating scales (overall fluency, speech rate, pausing, effort, melody, phrase length, grammaticality, and lexical retrieval) and answered questions about their current practices for assessing fluency in the clinic.
Results:
Interrater reliability for the eight perceptual rating scales ranged from fair to good. The most reliable scales were speech rate, pausing, and phrase length. Similarly, clinicians' perceived fluency ratings were most strongly correlated to objective measures of speech rate and utterance length but were also related to grammatical complexity, lexical diversity, and phonological errors. Clinicians' ratings reflected expected aphasia subtype patterns: Individuals with Broca's and transcortical motor aphasia were rated below average on fluency, whereas those with anomic, conduction, and Wernicke's aphasia were rated above average. Most respondents reported using multiple methods in the clinic to measure fluency but relying most frequently on subjective judgments.
Conclusions:
This study lends support for the use of perceptual rating scales as valid assessments of speech-language production but highlights the need for a more reliable method for clinical use. We describe next steps for developing such a tool that is clinically feasible and helps to identify the underlying deficits disrupting fluency to inform treatment targets.
Supplemental Material:
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19326419
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference65 articles.
1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021a). Profile of ASHA members and affiliates year-end 2020.
https://www.asha.org
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021b). Profile of ASHA members and affiliates with PhDs year-end 2020.
https://www.asha.org
3. Avidemux 2.6. (2017). [Computer software]. https://avidemux.org/
4. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability
5. Fluent aphasia in three languages: Aspects of spontaneous speech
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献