Using a Question Bank Intervention to Improve Socially Initiated Questions in Adolescents and Adults With Autism

Author:

Koegel Lynn Kern1ORCID,Koplen Zak2,Koegel Brittany1,Koegel Robert L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

2. Santa Barbara, CA

Abstract

Purpose Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often have difficulty asking questions during social conversation, which can negatively impact their interactions with peers. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a question bank intervention would be effective in improving question asking during social conversation. Method In the context of a multiple-baseline experimental design, we implemented an intervention using prepractice with question banks designed to increase the number and diversity of questions asked by adolescents and adults with ASD during social conversations with their peers. Results Following intervention, all participants improved their use of questions in natural settings with their neurotypical peers. Generalization to novel questions occurred, and gains were maintained at follow-up. Finally, supplemental measures of social validity showed that similarly aged neurotypical peers who were naïve to the experimental hypothesis rated two of the three participants with higher social desirability following intervention. Conclusion Individuals with ASD can improve their appropriate question asking during social conversation using a brief question bank intervention with generalization to their peers in natural settings.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference49 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

2. Bailey, J. S. , & Burch, M. R. (2018). Research methods in applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.

3. Barlow, M. D. , Nock, M. , & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior for change (3rd ed.). Pearson.

4. Carter, A. S. , Davis, N. O. , Klin, A. , & Volkmar, F. R. (2005). Social development in autism. In F. R. Volkmar , R. Paul , A. Klin , & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, Vol. 1: Diagnosis, development, neurobiology, and behavior (3rd ed., pp. 312–334). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939345.ch11

5. Carter, S. L. , & Wheeler, J. J. (2019). The social validity manual: Subjective evaluation of Interventions. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03852-1

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3