Assessment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Review/Tutorial of Objective Measurement Techniques

Author:

Terband Hayo1,Namasivayam Aravind2,Maas Edwin3,van Brenk Frits4,Mailend Marja-Liisa5,Diepeveen Sanne67,van Lieshout Pascal2,Maassen Ben8

Affiliation:

1. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics-OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands

2. Oral Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA

4. Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, NY

5. Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Moss Rehabilitation Hospital, Elkins Park, PA

6. HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

7. Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

8. Center for Language and Cognition, Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background With respect to the clinical criteria for diagnosing childhood apraxia of speech (commonly defined as a disorder of speech motor planning and/or programming), research has made important progress in recent years. Three segmental and suprasegmental speech characteristics—error inconsistency, lengthened and disrupted coarticulation, and inappropriate prosody—have gained wide acceptance in the literature for purposes of participant selection. However, little research has sought to empirically test the diagnostic validity of these features. One major obstacle to such empirical study is the fact that none of these features is stated in operationalized terms. Purpose This tutorial provides a structured overview of perceptual, acoustic, and articulatory measurement procedures that have been used or could be used to operationalize and assess these 3 core characteristics. Methodological details are reviewed for each procedure, along with a short overview of research results reported in the literature. Conclusion The 3 types of measurement procedures should be seen as complementary. Some characteristics are better suited to be described at the perceptual level (especially phonemic errors and prosody), others at the acoustic level (especially phonetic distortions, coarticulation, and prosody), and still others at the kinematic level (especially coarticulation, stability, and gestural coordination). The type of data collected determines, to a large extent, the interpretation that can be given regarding the underlying deficit. Comprehensive studies are needed that include more than 1 diagnostic feature and more than 1 type of measurement procedure.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference232 articles.

1. Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions

2. Temporal and spatial variability in speakers with Parkinson's disease and Friedreich's ataxia;Anderson A.;Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology,2008

3. Sequential and Non-speech Praxic Abilities in Developmental Verbal Apraxia

4. Voice onset time in aphasia, apraxia of speech and dysarthria: a review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3