Affiliation:
1. University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
Abstract
Differences in speech intelligibility and identification between binaural, monaural near ear, and monaural far ear conditions were studied in sound field conditions. Scores from listeners with normal hearing and with sensorineural losses were evalated in sound field conditions (unaided) and under conditions of hearing aid amplification (aided). For both conditions listeners with sensorineural hearing loss obtained a binaural advantage similar to that found for normal listeners. The binaural advantage could be demonstrated only when the primary and/or competing signal sources were located at an azimuth which resulted in interaural time differences for at least one of the signals. When the signals arrived simultaneously at the ears from the same loudspeaker, no binaural advantage was obtained. Differences in intelligibility and identification scores between monaural near ear and far ear conditions (6.0 dB) were almost twice as large as those found between binaural listening and monaural near ear listening (3.3 dB).
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference16 articles.
1. Binaural masking of speech by periodically modulated noise. ]. acoust;CARHART R.;Soc. Amer.,1966
2. The effectiveness of binaural heating for adults with heating impairments. ]. aud;DICA LO, L;Res.,1960
3. Interaural Intensity and Time Differences in Anechoic and Reverberant Rooms
4. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. ];WILSON R.;Speech Hearing Res.,1969
5. A comparison of monaural and binaural heating aids for listening to speech;HEDGECOCK L.;Arch. Otolarvng.,1958
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献