Affiliation:
1. Program of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe
Abstract
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate the acoustic changes in vowel production with different forms of auditory feedback via cochlear implant (CI), hearing aid (HA), and bimodal hearing (CI + HA).
Method:
Ten post–lingually deaf adult bimodal CI users (aged 50–78 years) produced English vowels /i/, /ɛ/, /æ/, /ɑ/, /ʊ/, and /u/ in the context of /hVd/ during short-term use of no device (ND), HA, CI, and CI + HA. Segmental features (first formant frequency [
F
1
], second formant frequency [
F
2
], and vowel space area) and suprasegmental features (duration, intensity, and fundamental frequency [
f
o
]) of vowel production were analyzed. Participants also categorized a vowel continuum synthesized from their own productions of /ɛ/ and /æ/ using HA, CI, and CI + HA.
Results:
F
1
s of all vowels decreased;
F
2
s of front vowels but not back vowels increased; vowel space areas increased; and vowel durations, intensities, and
f
o
s decreased with statistical significance in the HA, CI, and CI + HA conditions relative to the ND condition. Only
f
o
s were lower, and vowel space areas were larger with CI and CI + HA than with HA. Average changes in
f
o
, intensity, and
F
1
from the ND condition to the HA, CI, and CI + HA conditions were positively correlated. Most participants did not show a typical psychometric function for vowel categorization, and thus, the relationship between vowel categorization and production was not tested.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that acoustic, electric, and bimodal hearing have a measurable impact on vowel acoustics of post–lingually deaf adults when their hearing devices are turned on and off temporarily. Also, changes in
f
o
and
F
1
with the use of hearing devices may be largely driven by changes in intensity.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics