Test–Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory–Motor Control of Voice and Articulation

Author:

Kapsner-Smith Mara R.1ORCID,Abur Defne234,Eadie Tanya L.1ORCID,Stepp Cara E.256ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle

2. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA

3. Department of Computational Linguistics, Center for Language and Cognition, University of Groningen, the Netherlands

4. Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, the Netherlands

5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, MA

6. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, MA

Abstract

Purpose: Behavioral assays of feedforward and feedback auditory–motor control of voice and articulation frequently are used to make inferences about underlying neural mechanisms and to study speech development and disorders. However, no studies have examined the test–retest reliability of such measures, which is critical for rigorous study of auditory–motor control. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability of assays of feedforward and feedback control in voice versus articulation domains. Method: Twenty-eight participants (14 cisgender women, 12 cisgender men, one transgender man, one transmasculine/nonbinary) who denied any history of speech, hearing, or neurological impairment were measured for responses to predictable versus unexpected auditory feedback perturbations of vocal (fundamental frequency, f o ) and articulatory (first formant, F 1 ) acoustic parameters twice, with 3–6 weeks between sessions. Reliability was measured with intraclass correlations. Results: Opposite patterns of reliability were observed for f o and F 1 ; f o reflexive responses showed good reliability and f o adaptive responses showed poor reliability, whereas F 1 reflexive responses showed poor reliability and F 1 adaptive responses showed moderate reliability. However, a criterion-referenced categorical measurement of f o adaptive responses as typical versus atypical showed substantial test–retest agreement. Conclusions: Individual responses to some behavioral assays of auditory–motor control of speech should be interpreted with caution, which has implications for several fields of research. Additional research is needed to establish reliable criterion-referenced measures of F 1 adaptive responses as well as f o and F 1 reflexive responses. Furthermore, the opposite patterns of test–retest reliability observed for voice versus articulation add to growing evidence for differences in underlying neural control mechanisms.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3