Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
2. Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Portland State University, OR
Abstract
Purpose:
To date, there are no automated tools for the identification and fine-grained classification of paraphasias within discourse, the production of which is the hallmark characteristic of most people with aphasia (PWA). In this work, we fine-tune a large language model (LLM) to automatically predict paraphasia targets in Cinderella story retellings.
Method:
Data consisted of 332 Cinderella story retellings containing 2,489 paraphasias from PWA, for which research assistants identified their intended targets. We supplemented these training data with 256 sessions from control participants, to which we added 2,415 synthetic paraphasias. We conducted four experiments using different training data configurations to fine-tune the LLM to automatically “fill in the blank” of the paraphasia with a predicted target, given the context of the rest of the story retelling. We tested the experiments' predictions against our human-identified targets and stratified our results by ambiguity of the targets and clinical factors.
Results:
The model trained on controls and PWA achieved 50.7% accuracy at exactly matching the human-identified target. Fine-tuning on PWA data, with or without controls, led to comparable performance. The model performed better on targets with less human ambiguity and on paraphasias from participants with fluent or less severe aphasia.
Conclusions:
We were able to automatically identify the intended target of paraphasias in discourse using just the surrounding language about half of the time. These findings take us a step closer to automatic aphasic discourse analysis. In future work, we will incorporate phonological information from the paraphasia to further improve predictive utility.
Supplemental Material:
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24463543
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference72 articles.
1. Target word prediction and paraphasia classification in spoken discourse;Adams J.;BioNLP,2017
2. To BERT or not to BERT: Comparing speech and language-based approaches for Alzheimer's disease detection;Balagopalan A.;Interspeech,2020
3. Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off
4. Bock, K. (1995). Sentence production: From mind to mouth. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Speech, language, and communication (pp. 181–216). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012497770-9/50008-X
5. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a useful theoretical framework for guiding and evaluating a guideline implementation process in a hospital-based nursing practice