Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
Abstract
Background
It is unknown whether hospital outcomes differ among nonspeaking deaf patients compared to those without this disability.
Objective
This article aims to compare clinical outcomes and utilization data among patients with and without deafness.
Design
This study used a retrospective cohort study.
Setting and Participants
The participants included Nationwide Inpatient Sample, year 2017, hospitalized adults with and without diagnostic codes related to deafness and inability to speak.
Method
Multiple logistic and linear regression were used to compare in-hospital outcomes.
Results
Thirty million four hundred one thousand one hundred seventeen adults were hospitalized, and 7,180 had deafness and inability to speak related coding. Patients with deafness were older (mean age ±
SEM
: 59.2 ± 0.51 vs. 57.9 ± 0.09 years,
p
= .01), and less likely female (47.0% vs. 57.7%,
p
< .01) compared to controls. Those with deafness had more comorbidities compared to the controls (Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 3: 31.2% vs. 27.8%,
p
< .01). Mortality was higher among deaf versus controls (3.6% vs. 2.2%;
p
< .01); this translated into higher adjusted odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.7. [confidence interval (CI) 1.3–2.4];
p
= .01). Deaf patients had lower odds of being discharged home compared to controls {aOR} = 0.6, (CI) 0.55–0.73];
p
< .01. Length of stay was longer (adjusted mean difference = 1.5 days CI [0.7–2.3];
p
< .01) and hospital charges were higher, but not significantly so (adjusted mean difference = $4,193 CI [−$1,935–$10,322];
p
= .18) in patients with deafness.
Conclusions
Hospitalized nonspeaking deaf patients had higher mortality and longer hospital stays compared to those without this condition. These results suggest that specialized attention may be warranted when deaf patients are admitted to our hospitals in hopes of reducing disparities in outcomes.
Supplemental Material
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14336663
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference18 articles.
1. Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work
2. Research article. Deafness and mortality: analyses of linked data from the national health interview survey and national death index
3. Understanding the Use of Weights in the Analysis of Data From Multistage Surveys
4. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. (2008). NIS description of data elements. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp
5. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. (2020). NIS overview. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/vars/dispuniform/nisnote.jsp
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献