Affiliation:
1. Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis
2. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46202
Abstract
Traditional word-recognition tests typically use phonetically balanced (PB) word lists produced by one talker at one speaking rate. Intelligibility measures based on these tests may not adequately evaluate the perceptual processes used to perceive speech under more natural listening conditions involving many sources of stimulus variability. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech-perception abilities of 17 adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The effects of stimulus variability were studied by comparing word-identification performance in single-talker versus multipletalker conditions and at different speaking rates. Lexical difficulty was assessed by comparing recognition of "easy" words (i.e., words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar neighbors) with "hard" words (i.e., words that occur infrequently and have many similar neighbors). Subjects also completed a 20-item questionnaire to rate their speech understanding abilities in daily listening situations. Both sources of stimulus variability produced significant effects on speech intelligibility. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker condition than in the single-talker condition, and word-recognition performance decreased as speaking rate increased. Lexical effects on speech intelligibility were also observed. Word-recognition performance was significantly higher for lexically easy words than lexically hard words. Finally, word-recognition performance was correlated with scores on the self-report questionnaire rating speech understanding under natural listening conditions. The pattern of results suggest that perceptually robust speech-discrimination tests are able to assess several underlying aspects of speech perception in the laboratory and clinic that appear to generalize to conditions encountered in natural listening situations where the listener is faced with many different sources of stimulus variability. That is, wordrecognition performance measured under conditions where the talker varied from trial to trial was better correlated with self-reports of listening ability than was performance in a single-talker condition where variability was constrained.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference35 articles.
1. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: Retroactive effects on multiple activation;Cluff M. S.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1990
2. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP)
3. Word Frequency Effects for a Closed-Set Word Identification Task
4. Frequency selectivity in normally hearing and hearing-impaired observers;Florentine M.;Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,1980
5. On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists;Goldinger S. D.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition,1991
Cited by
77 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献