“Response to Treatment” in Dysphagia Rehabilitation: Factors for Consideration in Clinical Practice and Future Research

Author:

Krekeler Brittany Nicole1234ORCID,Rogus-Pulia Nicole345ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH

2. Department of Neurology & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH

3. Department of Surgery–Otolaryngology, University of Wisconsin–Madison

4. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison

5. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veteran's Hospital, Madison, WI

Abstract

Purpose: Some patients experience dysphagia that is not responsive to treatment. Despite application of appropriate evidence-based interventions, decreased swallow safety and/or efficiency persists. In order to provide the best opportunity for therapeutic efficacy, it is important to attempt to identify and characterize source of nonresponse. The definition of “nonresponse” will likely vary based on each patient depending on etiology and patient-specific goals. The purpose of this article is to outline some potential sources for patient nonresponse to dysphagia rehabilitation. We also aim to identify gaps in the literature that should be addressed in future research, to both further our understanding of nonresponse to dysphagia therapies and to better understand how to address nonresponse to improve patient outcomes. Method: Several potential sources of nonresponse are described, and specific areas of dysphagia rehabilitation research that require further investigation are discussed. Results: Based on available evidence, several sources of nonresponse to treatment are possible. First, application of interventions that are nonspecific to visualized impairments in swallow physiology could result in lack of treatment response. Patient population and etiology of dysphagia should also be considered when selecting a treatment approach to ensure that the available evidence supports use of that approach within the specific patient group. Patient adherence with rehabilitation protocols may affect response to treatment, although effects of adherence on dysphagia therapy efficacy are not fully understood. Furthermore, optimal dosing protocols to maximize benefit from rehabilitation approaches have not been fully appreciated in the literature. Conclusions: Understanding sources of nonresponse to treatment in dysphagia rehabilitation is multifaceted. Use of current literature to guide practice and therapy planning will help maximize patient benefit. However, in cases where the reason for nonresponse cannot be identified, it may be that the source lies in an area of dysphagia rehabilitation that has yet to be fully explored, including therapy dose and patient adherence among others.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3