Affiliation:
1. Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, NY
2. The School of Education, Ruth S. Ammon College of Education and Health Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY
Abstract
Purpose:
Ideologies are like rocks onto which individuals and institutions anchor their thoughts about what it means to be an “ideal language user” and what “standardized languaging” is. These deeply ingrained beliefs, influenced by colonial legacies and sociopolitical contexts, invisibly enforce a hierarchical order between people and their access to rights and privilege within societies. They inferiorize, marginalize, racialize, and nullify students and their families. The purposes of this tutorial are to reflect upon common dominant ideologies about language and languaging that are present in definitions, practices, and materials used in school-based settings by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and to offer an invitation to interrupt the practices that are birthed from upholding these beliefs and are dehumanizing to children and families living at the intersections of marginalization. To illustrate how these beliefs about language are enacted in the field of speech-language pathology, a selection of materials and approaches are presented and related to their ideological roots while implementing a critical stance.
Conclusions:
Ideologies uphold idealized versions of “normality” and constructions of “deviance.” Left unexamined, these beliefs remain encoded in traditionally considered scientific categories, policies, approaches, and materials. Critical reflexivity and action are key in the process of up-anchoring and shifting perspectives for ourselves and our institutions. The hope is that, through this tutorial, SLPs can increase their critical consciousness while envisioning how to interrupt oppressive dominant ideologies and, therefore, conceive of a future path that advocates for liberated languaging.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference80 articles.
1. Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge University Press.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1982). Language [Relevant paper]
.
https://www.asha.org/policy/rp1982-00125/
3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Definitions of communication disorders and variations [Relevant Paper].
https://www.asha.org/policy/rp1993-00208/
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). Bilingual service delivery [Practice portal]
. Retrieved July 21 2022 from https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Professional-Issues/Bilingual-Service-Delivery/
5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Social communication disorder [Practice portal]
. Retrieved December 12 2022 from http://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Social-Communication-Disorder/
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Communication Public Health: An Integration of Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology, and Public Health;Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research;2024-09-12
2. Black Languaging IS Translanguaging: We Not Just Talkin Bout It, We Bout It Bout It!;Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups;2024-06-26
3. Accent modification and workplace accentism: the institutionalization of linguistic profiling and its career implications;Career Development International;2024-03-14
4. Family-Centered Early Intervention Deaf/Hard of Hearing (FCEI-DHH): Guiding Values;The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education;2024-02-29
5. Reflect, Reframe, and Re-Imagine Theory and Practice in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences: Introduction to the Forum;Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools;2023-07-05