Affiliation:
1. Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA
2. Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, NY
3. Fordham Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, NY
4. The National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, RI
Abstract
Background:
Studies investigating auditory perception of gender expression vary greatly in the specific terms applied to gender expression in rating scales.
Purpose:
This study examined the effects of different anchor terms on listeners' auditory perceptions of gender expression in phonated and whispered speech. Additionally, token and speaker cues were examined to identify predictors of the auditory-perceptual ratings.
Method:
Inexperienced listeners (
n
= 105) completed an online rating study in which they were asked to use one of five visual analog scales (VASs) to rate cis men, cis women, and transfeminine speakers in both phonated and whispered speech. The VASs varied by anchor term (
very female/very male
,
feminine/masculine
,
feminine female/masculine male
,
very feminine/not at all feminine
, and
not at all masculine/very masculine
).
Results:
Linear mixed-effects models revealed significant two-way interactions of gender expression by anchor term and gender expression by condition. In general, the
feminine female/masculine male
scale resulted in the most extreme ratings (closest to the end points), and the
feminine/masculine
scale resulted in the most central ratings. As expected, for all speakers, whispered speech was rated more centrally than phonated speech. Additionally, ratings of phonated speech were predicted by mean fundamental frequency (
f
o
) within each speaker group and by smoothed cepstral peak prominence in cisgender speakers. In contrast, ratings of whispered speech, which lacks an
f
o
, were predicted by indicators of vocal tract resonance (second formant and speaker height).
Conclusions:
The current results indicate that differences in the terms applied to rating scales limit generalization of results across studies. Identifying the patterns across listener ratings of gender expression provide a rationale for researchers and clinicians when making choices about terms. Additionally, beyond
f
o
and vocal tract resonance, predictors of listener ratings vary based on the anchor terms used to describe gender expression.
Supplemental Material:
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19617564
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献