Core Values in the Traditional Provision of Hearing Health Care

Author:

Menon Katherine N.1ORCID,Hoon-Starr Michelle1,Shilton Katie2ORCID,Hoover Eric C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park

2. College of Information Studies, University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Purpose: Untreated hearing loss is a significant public health issue affecting the quality of life of millions of Americans. Barriers to treatment invite novel and innovation solutions, but as these solutions create new treatment delivery models, they also may—purposefully or accidentally—challenge the values of the field. Method: Value-sensitive design methodology is used in this study to identify the values in current hearing health care service delivery. We performed qualitative content analysis of questionnaires, clinical practice guidelines, and professional ethics documents that represent the intended and enacted values in audiology. Results: The result is a comprehensive list of values that can be used as a structured codebook for systematic textual analysis of materials representing current best practices in the provision of hearing health care services. A secondary result is an analysis of the relative importance of values in audiology, inferred from the frequency of references to each value. Conclusions: Subjective benefit, professional duties, and self-efficacy were the core values identified in the current provision of audiologic care, and these values should be central to considerations for new hearing health care models and technologies.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference56 articles.

1. Academy of Doctors of Audiology. (n.d.). Code of ethics. Retrieved May 5 2020 from https://www.audiologist.org/_resources/documents/about/academy-docs/Code-of-Ethics.pdf

2. American Academy of Audiology. (2019). Standards of practice for audiology. https://www.audiology.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/StandardsofPractice.pdf_539945677d6235.20360502.pdf

3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Code of ethics [Ethics] . https://www.asha.org/Code-of-Ethics/

4. Guidelines for Hearing Aid Fitting for Adults

5. Atkinson, P. , & Coffey, A. (1995). Realism and its discontents: On the crisis of cultural representation in ethnographic texts. In A. Barbara & A. Stuart (Eds.), Theorizing culture: An interdisciplinary critique after postmodernism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137017-7

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Amplifying Access: Progress After 1 Year of Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids;Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups;2024-04-04

2. Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Challenge the Core Values of Traditional Audiology;Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research;2024-02-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3