Implementation of Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders Research With Black, Indigenous, and People of Color

Author:

Girolamo Teresa1ORCID,Castro Nichol2ORCID,Hendricks Alison Eisel2ORCID,Ghali Samantha3ORCID,Eigsti Inge-Marie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs

2. Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, NY

3. Child Language Doctoral Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence

Abstract

Purpose: Open science that is truly accessible and transparent to all will enhance reproducibility. However, there are ethical and practical concerns in implementing open science practices, especially when working with populations who are systematically excluded from and marginalized in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) research, such as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) from clinical populations. The purpose of this article was to discuss these concerns and present actionable steps to support open science in CSD research with BIPOC. Conclusions: In the movement toward open and reproducible science, the discipline of CSD must prioritize accessibility and transparency, in addition to the implementation of individual scientific practices. Such a focus requires building trust with BIPOC not only as research participants but also as valued leaders of the scientific community.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference80 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association: The official guide to APA style (7th ed.).

2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2021). Strategic objective highlights. https://www.asha.org/about/strategic-objective-highlights/

3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Guidelines for reporting your research. https://academy.pubs.asha.org/asha-journals-author-resource-center/manuscript-preparation/guidelines-for-reporting-your-research/

4. Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability

5. Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3