Diversity of Research Participant Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Publications in 2020

Author:

Millager Ryan A.1ORCID,Feldman Jacob I.23ORCID,Williams Zachary J.1345ORCID,Shibata Kiiya1ORCID,Martinez-Torres Keysha A.12ORCID,Bryan Katherine M.1ORCID,Pruett Dillon G.1ORCID,Mitchell Jade T.1ORCID,Markfeld Jennifer E.13ORCID,Merritt Brandon6ORCID,Daniels Derek E.7ORCID,Jones Robin M.128ORCID,Woynaroski Tiffany23489ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

2. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

3. The Frist Center for Autism and Innovation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

4. Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

5. Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN

6. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso

7. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

8. Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

9. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu

Abstract

Purpose: One manifestation of systemic inequities in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) is the chronic underreporting and underrepresentation of sex, gender, race, and ethnicity in research. The present study characterized recent demographic reporting practices and representation of participants across CSD research. Method: We systematically reviewed and extracted key reporting and participant data from empirical studies conducted in the United States with human participants published in the year 2020 in journals by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA; 407 articles comprising a total of 80,058 research participants, search completed in November 2021). Sex, gender, race, and ethnicity were operationalized per National Institutes of Health guidelines. Results: Sex or gender was reported in 85.5% of included studies; race in 33.7%; and ethnicity in 13.8%. Sex and gender were clearly differentiated in 3.4% of relevant studies. Where reported, median proportions for race and ethnicity were significantly different from the U.S. population, with underrepresentation noted for all non-White racial groups and Hispanic participants. Moreover, 64.7% of studies that reported sex or gender and 67.2% of studies that reported race or ethnicity did not consider these respective variables in analyses or discussions. Conclusions: At present, research published in ASHA journals frequently fails to report key demographic data summarizing the characteristics of participants. Moreover, apparent gaps in the representation of minoritized racial and ethnic groups threaten the external validity of CSD research and broader health care equity endeavors in the United States. Although our study is limited to a single year and publisher, our results point to several steps for readers that may bring greater accountability, consistency, and diversity to the discipline. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25718412

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Reference79 articles.

1. Committing to the Inclusion of Diverse Populations in Clinical Research

2. Should research samples reflect the diversity of the population?

3. American Psychological Association. (2020). Concise guide to APA style (7th ed.).

4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-a). ASHA Journals Author Resource Center. ASHA Journals Academy. https://academy.pubs.asha.org/asha-journals-author-resource-center/

5. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.-b). Guidelines for reporting your research. ASHA Journals Academy. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://academy.pubs.asha.org/asha-journals-author-resource-center/manuscript-preparation/guidelines-for-reporting-your-research/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3