Affiliation:
1. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo
2. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson
Abstract
Purpose:
This study evaluated the equivalence of the Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills (TILLS) when administrated via telepractice (Tele-TILLS) and face-to-face methods.
Method:
Participants were 51 children and adolescents in three age bands, ages 6–7 years (
n
= 9), 8–11 years (
n
= 21), and 12–18 years (
n
= 21). Data were gathered by 25 volunteer examiners who assessed the same participants twice within a 2- to 4-week period, using Tele-TILLS and traditional methods in randomly selected, counterbalanced order.
Results:
Evaluation of identification equivalence showed 96% agreement between methods (49 of 51 decisions), with 39 agreements of
no
disorder, 10 agreements of
yes
disorder, and two disagreements (
yes
disorder for Tele-TILLS and
no
disorder for traditional). Partial correlations, controlled for test order, showed moderate to high agreement between all composite and subtest scores, except Nonword Repetition. Scoring by examiners and the first author showed high interrater agreement. No differences between Nonword Repetition scores were found for students who wore headsets (
n
= 12), whereas differences were found for those who did not (
n
= 34).
Conclusions:
This study provided preliminary evidence that Tele-TILLS results can be equivalent to traditional TILLS, supporting its validity for identifying language/literacy disorder and interpreting profiles. The small, highly homogeneous sample with well-educated parents limits generalizability to the broader population. Caution is warranted when testing 6- to 7-year-old students for whom Nonword Repetition is part of the Identification Core score. Suggestions are provided for optimizing technological setup, preparing facilitators, and making minor modifications in subtest administration.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献