Affiliation:
1. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD
Abstract
Purpose
We developed 1 clinical question for this review, which addressed the comparison of hearing aids using frequency lowering compared to conventional processing amplification for outcomes of audibility, speech recognition, speech and language, and self- or parent-report for children with hearing loss.
Method
We systematically searched 26 databases for studies addressing a clinical question and meeting all inclusion criteria. We evaluated studies for methodological quality and reported or calculated effect sizes when possible.
Results
The literature search resulted in the inclusion of 5 studies. We implemented several different frequency-lowering strategies across studies; 2 studies used nonlinear frequency compression, 2 used frequency transposition, and 1 used frequency compression with dynamic consonant boost.
Conclusions
Whereas methodological limitations of the included studies preclude the formulation of strong conclusions, findings were generally positive across frequency-lowering strategies and outcomes. Additional high-quality research is needed in this area.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference61 articles.
1. Effect of linear frequency transposition on speech recognition and production of school-age children;*Auriemmo J.;Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,2009
2. Use of frequency-shifted/time-compressed speech with hearing-impaired children;Beasley D. S.;Audiology,1976
3. Increased intelligibility in the hypacusic by slow-play frequency transposition;Bennett D. S.;Journal of Auditory Research,1967
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献