Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
2. Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
Abstract
Purpose
This study sought to evaluate the effects of common hearing aid microphone technologies on speech recognition and listening effort, and to evaluate potential predictive factors related to microphone benefits for school-age children with hearing loss in a realistic listening situation.
Method
Children (
n
= 17, ages 10–17 years) with bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids set to include three programs: omnidirectional, adaptive directional, and omnidirectional + remote microphone. Children completed a dual-task paradigm in a moderately reverberant room. The primary task included monosyllabic word recognition, with target speech presented at 60 dB A from 0° (front) or 180° (back) azimuth. The secondary task was a “go/no-go,” visual shape-recognition task. Multitalker babble noise created a +5 dB SNR. Children were evaluated in two speaker conditions (front, back) using all three hearing aid programs. The remote microphone transmitter remained at the front speaker throughout testing. Speech recognition performance was calculated from the primary task while listening effort was measured as response time during the secondary task.
Results
Speech presented from the back significantly increased listening effort and caused a reduction in speech perception when directional and remote microphones were used. Considerable variability was found in pattern of benefit across microphones and source location. Clinical measures did not predict benefit patterns with directional or remote microphones; however, child age and performance with omnidirectional microphones did.
Conclusions
When compared to a traditional omnidirectional setting, the directional and remote microphone configurations evaluated in this study have the potential to provide benefit for some children and increase difficulty for others when used in dynamic environments. A child's performance with omnidirectional hearing aids could be used to better inform clinical recommendations for these technologies.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference89 articles.
1. American Academy of Audiology. (2011). AAA clinical practice guidelines: Remote microphone hearing assistance technologies for children and youth birth–21 years.
https://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/hearing-assistance-technologies
2. American National Standards Institute. (2010). Acoustical performance criteria design requirements and guidelines for schools Part 1: Permanent schools (ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010)
.
3. Speech Perception Benefits of FM and Infrared Devices to Children With Hearing Aids in a Typical Classroom
4. Efficacy of an adaptive directional microphone and a noise reduction system for school-aged children;Auriemmo J.;Journal of Educational Audiology,2009
5. Exploring the Central Executive
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献