Court Accommodations for People With Aphasia (1915–2021)

Author:

Sherratt Sue1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Communication Research Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales

Abstract

Purpose: Ensuring effective access to justice for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others may include the provision of reasonable and appropriate accommodations or modifications to the court process. The major barriers facing people with aphasia when accessing court may be more about accessing information about the law and the communication and language barriers while interacting with the court and judicial personnel. This study aims to determine what accommodations to the court process are reported when people with aphasia access the U.S. court system. Method: Using the LexisNexis and Google Scholar case law databases, a systematic review of all U.S. court cases (1915–2021) documenting aphasia/dysphasia revealed 1,295 case reports, excluding duplicates. After elimination for exclusion criteria, 389 were searched for accommodation/modification, resulting in a total of 15 cases being identified. Data software was used to identify aphasia description, health professionals, and accommodations provided. Quantitative descriptive statistics are provided and exemplified with quotes. Results: Accommodations to allow greater participation for people with aphasia were rarely permitted. Analysis revealed limited descriptions of aphasia and demonstrated that the court, the judge, or psychologists determined modifications with no speech-language pathology input. Accommodations reported related to modifications to the court proceedings, questioning, alternative responses, presence of a support person, and preparation for the trial. Conclusions: People with aphasia are at continued risk of being unable to access and participate in the court system without appropriate accommodations. Based on these findings and disability literature, a preliminary provisional list of accommodations and modifications relevant to people with aphasia is presented. The aim of this list is to expedite and promote the use of courtroom accommodations for these individuals.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Reference59 articles.

1. Americans with Disabilities. (2020). ADA requirements: Effective communication. https://www.ada.gov/effective-comm.htm

2. Quality and readability of English-language internet information for aphasia

3. Disability Civil Rights Law and Policy: Accessible courtroom technology;Blanck P.;William & Mary Bill Rights Journal,2003

4. Identifying barriers in the South African Criminal Justice System: Implications for individuals with severe communication disability;Bornman J.;Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology,2016

5. Ending the Silence of People with Little or No Functional Speech: Testifying in Court

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3