Clear Masks Do Not Prevent Gains During Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing Treatment: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Pilot Study

Author:

Iuzzini-Seigel Jenya1ORCID,Murray Elizabeth23,Velleman Shelley L.4ORCID,Bricker-Katz Geraldine3,Thomas Donna3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

2. Remarkable Speech + Movement, Panania, New South Wales, Australia

3. Discipline of Speech Pathology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

4. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Vermont, Burlington

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the outcomes and impact of Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) treatment when clear vinyl masks were worn. DTTC is one of the few evidence-based treatments for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Given that DTTC relies on visual, auditory, and tactile cues, it was unknown if treatment gains would be demonstrated when masks were worn and how masking would impact the therapy experience for clinicians and caregivers. Method: A sequential mixed methods design was used to study the efficacy of DTTC treatment in children with CAS when clear masks were worn. The quantitative phase used a multiple-baseline across-participants design. Four children (each 4 years of age) participated in the treatment protocol in which 24 sessions of DTTC were provided over 8 weeks while clear vinyl face masks were worn by participants and clinicians. Whole word accuracy on treated items and generalization to easy and hard untreated items were assessed during baseline, treatment, and follow-up. Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians and caregivers following treatment to explore the experience of masks being worn during treatment. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis. Results: Three children completed the treatment protocol. Visual and statistical analyses revealed that two participants demonstrated significant treatment effects, with one also demonstrating generalization. The remaining participant demonstrated marginal treatment gains. Qualitative findings revealed two main themes: “mask wearing was inconvenient but did not prevent therapy gains” and “in-person therapy with face masks was preferable to teletherapy.” Conclusions: Masks did not prohibit treatment gains during DTTC therapy, with treatment effects of varying degrees shown for the three participants who completed the protocol. Together, quantitative and qualitative results indicate that mask wearing was, for most, a minor inconvenience that did not substantially interfere with the efficacy of DTTC treatment. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.26408854

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Reference69 articles.

1. Telehealth intervention and childhood apraxia of speech: a scoping review

2. Baker, E. (2017). Toddler Polysyllable Test for GAE (T-POT for GAE). The University of Sydney.

3. Ballard, K. J., & Robin, D. A. (2021). Speech motor programming intervention. In A. L. Williams, S. McLeod, & R. McCauley (Eds.), Interventions for speech sound disorders in children (pp. 629–667). Brookes.

4. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper

5. Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3