Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Content and Criterion Validity Across Evidence-Based Voice Therapies for Muscle Tension Dysphonia

Author:

Van Stan Jarrad H.123ORCID,Roy Nelson4ORCID,Stemple Joseph5,Gartner-Schmidt Jaqueline6,Gillespie Amanda I.7ORCID,Whyte John8,Duffy Joseph9ORCID,Turkstra Lyn10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

3. MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA

4. The University of Utah, Salt Lake City

5. University of Kentucky, Lexington

6. Carlow University, Pittsburgh, PA

7. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

8. Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA

9. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

10. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: Systematically improving voice therapy outcomes is challenging as the clinician actions (i.e., active ingredients) responsible for improved patient functioning (i.e., targets) are relatively unknown. The theory-driven Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and standard, voice-specific terminology based on the RTSS (RTSS-Voice) may help address this problem. This qualitative study evaluated if the RTSS and RTSS-Voice can describe four evidence-based voice therapies for muscle tension dysphonia without missing critical aspects (content validity) and identify commonalities and differences across them (criterion validity). Method: Qualitative interviews were completed between the clinicians (protocol experts) who developed and/or popularized the vocal function exercises, laryngeal reposturing, circumlaryngeal massage, and conversation training therapies as well as RTSS experts to produce RTSS specifications that met two consensus criteria: (a) The protocol expert agreed that the specification represented their treatment theory, and (b) the RTSS experts agreed that the specifications correctly adhered to both the RTSS framework and the RTSS-Voice's standard terminology. Results: The RTSS and RTSS-Voice comprehensively described voice therapy variations across and within the four diverse treatment programs, needing only the addition of one new target: overall auditory-perceptual severity. Conclusions: The RTSS and RTSS-Voice exhibited strong content validity. The standard RTSS-Voice terminology helped identify, for the first time, commonalities and differences in treatment ingredients, targets, and mechanisms of action across four treatments developed for the same patient population. In the long term, the RTSS and RTSS-Voice could provide the framework for an ever-growing collection of clinically meaningful and evidence-based therapy algorithms with potential to improve research, education, and clinical care. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25537624

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Reference77 articles.

1. Impaired auditory discrimination and auditory-motor integration in hyperfunctional voice disorders

2. Effects of Vocal Function Exercises: A Systematic Review

3. Methodological Issues in Rehabilitation Research: A Scoping Review

4. Aronson, A. E. (1990). Clinical voice disorders (3rd ed.). Thieme Medical.

5. Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science;Baumann A.;Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3