Affiliation:
1. Ohio University, Athens
2. University of Washington, Seattle
Abstract
PurposeIn this series of articles—Research Ethics I,Research Ethics II,andResearch Ethics III—the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity. InResearch Ethics I,they present a historical overview of the evolution of RCR in the United States then examine the evolution of human and animal experimentation from the birth of scientific medicine through World War II to the present day.MethodThey relied on authoritative documents, both historical and contemporary, insightful commentary, and empirical research in order to identify current issues and controversies of potential interest to both faculty and students.ConclusionsThe authors have written this article from a historical perspective because they think all readers interested in RCR should appreciate how the history of science and all the good—and harm—it has produced can inform how researchers practice responsible research in the 21st century and beyond.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference324 articles.
1. Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach No. 04-5350. (D.C. Cir. Ct. App. August 7 2007)
2. Abney v. Amgen U.S. Dist. LEXIS14258 (E.D. Ky. 2005) aff’d 443 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2006)
3. Addressing nurses' ethical concerns about research in critical care settings;Alt-White A. C.;Nursing Administration Quarterly,2006
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献