Affiliation:
1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
2. Masters Family Speech and Hearing Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, WI
Abstract
Determining the type of secondary surgical management to treat velopharyngeal dysfunction requires the incorporation of surgical indications and principles to the perceptual, acoustic/airflow, and imaging results of a comprehensive evaluation by a speech-language pathologist. In addition, how the specific type of surgical technique (primary and/or secondary) may affect velopharyngeal function also should be considered. The purpose of this paper is to consider three standard techniques commonly employed in speech surgery—Pharyngeal Flap; Sphincter Pharyngoplasty; and Furlow Double Opposing Z-Plasty—and provide examples of the specific imaging parameters that support the choice of surgical technique. In addition, information is provided regarding the characteristics of different primary surgical techniques for cleft palate which can influence velopharyngeal closure, given that the most common cause of velopharyngeal dysfunction seen in the clinic is a patient with a history of repaired cleft palate.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference29 articles.
1. Parameters for the evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial anomalies;American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association;Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal,2009
2. Modified orttichochea pharyngoplasty for treatment of unilateral velopharyngeal incompetence;Bonawitz S. C.;Annals of Plastic Surgery,1995
3. Correction of secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients with the Furlow palatoplasty;Chen P. K.-T.;Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,1996
4. Cleft palate repair by double-opposing z-plasty;Furlow L. T.;Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery,1986
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献