Differences Between Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Hearing Loss at Age 61–63 Years: The Newcastle Thousand Families Birth Cohort

Author:

Iskakova Balnur12,Forster Lara N.1,Mann Kay D.1,Brown Morven1,Slack Emma L.1,Rees Adrian3,Pearce Mark S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

2. School of Public Health, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

3. Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Abstract

Purpose: Hearing loss is most prevalent among older adults, yet underestimated by patients, clinicians, and research communities. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of self-reported hearing difficulties among a group of adults aged 61–63 years, against audiometric measures. Method: The analysis used a sample ( N = 346) of the Newcastle Thousand Families Study birth cohort. Data from audiological examinations and self-reported hearing difficulties were used to compare subjective and objective hearing. Hearing aid use was also assessed. Results: Over 40% of the participants had some level of hearing loss ( n = 155, 44.8%), and 31% ( n = 133) of these reported having hearing problems during subjective assessment. Only 18 (10%) of those with objectively measured hearing loss reported using hearing aids. Conclusions: There was an inconsistency between measured and self-perceived hearing loss among adults aged 61–63 years in this cohort. The small number of hearing aid users in the cohort is a concern, in that people in this age group appear not to be getting the help they need. The data also add to the research evidence that people at this age underestimate their hearing loss.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3