The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Pure-Tone Average Predict Hearing Aid Use Equally Well

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to (a) compare the Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory (RHHI) and pure-tone average (PTA) in their abilities to predict hearing aid use and (b) report the optimal cut-point values on the RHHI and PTA that predict hearing aid use. Method: Participants were from a community-based cohort study. We evaluated the ability of the RHHI and PTA as (a) continuous variables and (b) binary variables characterized by the optimal cut point determined by the Youden Index to predict hearing aid use. RHHI scores range from 0 to 72, and PTA was defined as averaged thresholds at frequencies 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz in the worse ear. We used logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves with corresponding concordance statistics ( c -statistics) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the predictive ability of models and chi-square tests to determine whether c -statistics were significantly different. Results: This study included 581 participants ( M age = 72.9 [ SD = 9.9] years; 59.9% female; 14.3% Minority race). The c -statistics for the RHHI (0.79, 95% CI [0.75, 0.83]) and PTA (0.81, 95% CI [0.78, 0.85]), as continuous variables, were not significantly different ( p = .25). The optimal cut points for the RHHI and PTA to predict hearing aid use were 6 points and 32.5 dB HL, respectively. The c -statistics for the RHHI (0.72, 95% CI [0.68, 0.76]) and PTA (0.75, 95% CI [0.71, 0.79]), as binary variables, were not significantly different ( p = .27). Conclusion: The RHHI and PTA are similar in their ability to predict hearing aid use.