Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY
2. Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to report the variability of electrolarynx (EL) users' speech intelligibility in quiet and in multitalker babble.
Method
Ten EL users (five Servox® Digital, five TruTone™) who were at least 2 years postlaryngectomy provided recordings of five sentences from the 1965 Revised List of Phonetically Balanced Sentences. Recordings were judged by two groups of naïve listeners in quiet and in the presence of multitalker babble. Fifteen listeners orthographically transcribed a total of 750 sentences containing 3,750 key words in quiet, and another 15 listeners orthographically transcribed the same sentences mixed with multitalker babble.
Results
Significant differences in speech intelligibility were observed between listening conditions; 17.9% more key words were correctly identified in quiet compared to multitalker babble. Significant differences in fundamental frequency (F
0
) standard deviation and range but not speech intelligibility were observed between EL device types. A positive correlation of moderate significance was observed between F
0
standard deviation and intelligibility for TruTone users in multitalker babble.
Conclusions
Findings suggest that listeners are able to identify a significantly higher percentage of EL users' speech in quiet compared to multitalker babble, but a large variability in EL users' speech intelligibility exists. Continued investigation involving a larger number of EL users is necessary to confirm this study's findings. Future research should explore the relationships among F
0
measures, speaker characteristics (e.g., rate of speech, articulatory precision), and speech intelligibility, in addition to improving alaryngeal rehabilitation training protocols for EL users.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference40 articles.
1. Using visual feedback to enhance intonation control with a variable pitch electrolarynx
2. American Cancer Society. (2020). Cancer facts and figures.
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/cancer-facts-and-figures-2020.pdf
3. Audacity Team. (2020). Audacity: Free audio editor and recorder (Version 2.2.2).
https://audacityteam.org/
4. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
5. Acceptability Ratings of Normal, Esophageal, and Artificial Larynx Speech
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献