Affiliation:
1. Department of Education, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
2. School of Occupational Therapy, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel
Abstract
Purpose:
We studied the role of gender in metacognition of voice emotion recognition ability (ERA), reflected by self-rated confidence (SRC). To this end, we guided our study in two approaches: first, by examining the role of gender in voice ERA and SRC independently and second, by looking for gender effects on the ERA association with SRC.
Method:
We asked 100 participants (50 men, 50 women) to interpret a set of vocal expressions portrayed by 30 actors (16 men, 14 women) as defined by their emotional meaning. Targets were 180 repetitive lexical sentences articulated in congruent emotional voices (anger, sadness, surprise, happiness, fear) and neutral expressions. Trial by trial, the participants were assigned retrospective SRC based on their emotional recognition performance.
Results:
A binomial generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) estimating ERA accuracy revealed a significant gender effect, with women encoders (speakers) yielding higher accuracy levels than men. There was no significant effect of the decoder's (listener's) gender. A second GLMM estimating SRC found a significant effect of encoder and decoder genders, with women outperforming men. Gamma correlations were significantly greater than zero for women and men decoders.
Conclusions:
In spite of varying interpretations of gender in each independent rating (ERA and SRC), our results suggest that both men and women decoders were accurate in their metacognition regarding voice emotion recognition. Further research is needed to study how individuals of both genders use metacognitive knowledge in their emotional recognition and whether and how such knowledge contributes to effective social communication.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference84 articles.
1. Age and Gender Differences in Emotion Recognition
2. Gender, metacognitive intervention, and dialogic interaction: EFL multimedia listening;Alamdari E. F.;System,2022
3. Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression.
4. Bänziger, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). Using actor portrayals to systematically study multimodal emotion expression: The GEMEP corpus. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction: Second International Conference, ACII 2007 Lisbon, Portugal, September 12–14, 2007 Proceedings 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_42
5. Confidence of emotion expression recognition recruits brain regions outside the face perception network