Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
2. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The College of Saint Rose, Albany, NY
Abstract
Purpose
In this letter, the authors respond to
Guo, Eisenberg, Ratner, and MacWhinney's (2018)
letter to the editor, which expressed concerns regarding the clinical applicability of the Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR;
Pavelko & Owens, 2017
) language sample analysis (LSA) method.
Method
The authors respond to concerns regarding transcription and morpheme segmentation and language sample elicitation contexts. The results of two published research studies are described, which detail the impact of this new LSA method.
Results
Published research studies have documented that the SUGAR method of LSA can accurately distinguish between children developing language typically and children with language impairment and can also aid clinicians in developing intervention goals.
Conclusion
SUGAR is a clinically applicable method of LSA that clinicians can use as one part of a comprehensive evaluation to efficiently and accurately identify children with language impairment. Further, clinicians can complete subanalysis of a language sample to identify appropriate therapy targets.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献