How Gender Stereotypes May Limit Female Faculty Advancement in Communication Sciences and Disorders

Author:

Rogus-Pulia Nicole1234,Humbert Ianessa567,Kolehmainen Christine14,Carnes Molly148910

Affiliation:

1. Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison

2. Division of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison

3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin–Madison

4. William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Madison, WI

5. College of Health and Health Professions, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Swallowing Systems Core, University of Florida, Gainesville

6. College of Public Health and Health Professions, Center for Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville

7. Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville

8. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison

9. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison

10. Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin–Madison

Abstract

Purpose The field of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) faces a critical shortage of the faculty essential to train the future workforce of speech-language pathologists and audiologists. Despite a predominance of women in the field, men receive doctoral degrees, tenure status, academic leadership positions, and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association awards at disproportionately higher rates than women. The purpose of this review is to explore how implicit gender bias may contribute to female faculty advancement, including current and projected faculty workforce shortages, and to propose tangible solutions. Method The authors present proportions of men and women who receive doctoral degrees, advance to each faculty rank, receive tenure status, hold department chairs in CSD, and receive American Speech-Language-Hearing Association honors and awards. They review ways in which cultural stereotypes give rise to implicit gender bias and discuss myriad ways that implicit gender bias may influence the decisions of students considering an academic career in CSD and their career trajectories. Conclusions Cultural stereotypes about men and women lead to implicit gender bias that may have real consequences for female faculty advancement in CSD. Such implicit bias can influence career selection and outcomes within the field in multiple ways. To ensure that CSD continues to attract top talent and maintain a robust pipeline of future faculty in doctoral training programs, the field must recognize the existence of implicit gender bias and implement evidence-based strategies to minimize its potentially damaging effects on the future of the profession.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference109 articles.

1. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others.

2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2015). SLP health care survey annual salary report. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2015-SLP-Health-Care-Survey-Annual-Salaries.pdf

3. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). PhD programs in communication sciences and disorders: Innovative models and practices. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2016-PhD-Programs-in-CSD-Report.pdf

4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2017a). ASHA summary membership and affiliation counts year-end 2016. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/uploadedFiles/2016-Member-Counts.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3