Generalization in Aphasia Treatment: A Tutorial for Speech-Language Pathologists

Author:

Mayer Jamie F.1ORCID,Madden Elizabeth B.2ORCID,Mozeiko Jennifer3ORCID,Murray Laura L.4,Patterson Janet P.5ORCID,Purdy Mary6ORCID,Sandberg Chaleece W.7ORCID,Wallace Sarah E.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Allied Health and Communicative Disorders, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb

2. School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee

3. Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs

4. School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Canadian Centre for Activity and Aging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

5. Research Service, VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather

6. Department of Communication Disorders, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven

7. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

8. Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

Purpose: Generalization has been defined and instantiated in a variety of ways over the last half-century, and this lack of consistency has created challenges for speech-language pathologists to plan for, implement, and measure generalization in aphasia treatment protocols. This tutorial provides an overview of generalization with a focus on how it relates to aphasia intervention, including a synthesis of existing principles of generalization and examples of how these can be embedded in approaches to aphasia treatment in clinical and research settings. Method: Three articles collectively listing 20 principles of generalization formed the foundation for this tutorial. The seminal work of Stokes and Baer (1977) focused attention on generalization in behavioral change following treatment. Two aphasia-specific resources identified principles of generalization in relation to aphasia treatment (Coppens & Patterson, 2018; Thompson, 1989). A selective literature review was conducted to identify evidence-based examples of each of these 20 principles from the extant literature. Results: Five principles of generalization were synthesized from the original list of 20. Each principle was supported by studies drawn from the aphasia treatment literature to exemplify its application. Conclusions: Generalization is an essential aspect of meaningful aphasia intervention. Successful generalization requires the same dedication to strategic planning and outcome measurement as the direct training aspect of intervention. Although not all people with aphasia are likely to benefit equally from each of the principles reviewed herein, our synthesis provides information to consider for maximizing generalization of aphasia treatment outcomes. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24714399

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference119 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3