Effects of Warning Validity and Proximity on Responses to Warnings

Author:

Meyer Joachim1

Affiliation:

1. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

Abstract

The effects of a warning's validity and display characteristics on the responses to binary warnings were studied in a categorization task that resembled the control of a simulated production environment. Students performed a visual signal detection task and were aided by a binary warning indicator. Experimental conditions differed in the validity of the warning and its proximity to the judged stimulus. Participants' performance improved over the course of the experiment, and they partly adjusted their responses to the validity of the warnings but continued to respond to nonvalid warnings throughout the experiment. It was particularly difficult to ignore the nonvalid information when it was integrated with the continuous information. There was evidence for nonoptimal use of the information from the warning system, whether it was valid or not valid. The results indicate a possible distinction between two dimensions of users' trust in warning systems: compliance and reliance. Actual or potential implications of this research include improved warning design based on analysis of system and operator characteristics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cited by 178 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Benchmarking automation-aided performance in a forensic face matching task;Applied Ergonomics;2024-11

2. Selective Access to Decision Support as a Function of Event Uncertainty;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society;2024-09-03

3. Experts and Non-Experts Use Diagnostic Aids Inefficiently;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2024-08-30

4. Decision support improves information integration and criterion placement in a multi-cue signal-identification task;Ergonomics;2024-08-07

5. Modeling, Engendering and Leveraging Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: A Mental Model Based Framework;Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction;2024-03-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3